剧情简介
影片讲述一名平凡的主妇收到一封来自美容师的邮件，女郎因此为契机主妇化作一名跟踪者而引发了一系列故事。主妇小夜子由常盘贵子饰演，女郎美容师海斗则由池松壮亮担当。另外，小夜子的丈夫光太郎由胜村政信出演，海斗的恋人唯则是佐津川爱美担任。《谁的木琴》的主题是在人类之间的联系逐渐变淡的现代，女性在精神上的饥饿感、疏离感以及不得不和其对峙的男性之间所产生的共鸣。
再见女郎1977
影片讲述一名平凡的主妇收到一封来自美容师的邮件，女郎因此为契机主妇化作一名跟踪者而引发了一系列故事。主妇小夜子由常盘贵子饰演，女郎美容师海斗则由池松壮亮担当。另外，小夜子的丈夫光太郎由胜村政信出演，海斗的恋人唯则是佐津川爱美担任。《谁的木琴》的主题是在人类之间的联系逐渐变淡的现代，女性在精神上的饥饿感、疏离感以及不得不和其对峙的男性之间所产生的共鸣。
沈芳如
回复 :根据中国古典名著《聊斋志异》改编。秦汉年间，都尉王生（陈坤 饰）率王家军在西域苦战，并救回一女子小唯（周迅 饰）。王生并没有看到在他到来之前，小唯刚刚吞食完人心以保持人形。九霄美狐小唯对王生一见钟情，跟随他回家后以妹妹自居，眼看王生与佩容（赵薇 饰）夫妻情深，暗地里想取代佩容地位成为王生妻子。深爱着小唯且一直为她杀人取心的蜥蜴精小易几度向小唯表白，却被小唯怒吼而走。城里越来越多的人死于心脏被挖，王生誓要查个水落石出，佩容已经觉得小唯异于常人且对丈夫有意。碍于王生对小唯的一片信任，她唯有去寻求当年负气出走的旧情人庞勇（甄子丹 饰）帮忙，而降魔者夏冰出于天命亦自告奋勇去除妖。佩容所作一切但求王生安好，王生心痛佩容不相信自己，小唯委曲求全希冀得到爱情，庞勇和夏冰已蓄势待发。©豆瓣
伍家辉
回复 :讲述俄罗斯传奇诗人、歌手维索茨基的传记电影
山崎将义
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
