余少群
发表于4分钟前
回复
:玛莎(马蒂娜•戈黛特 Martina Gedeck 饰)是一家餐厅的厨师长,不仅人长得漂亮,而且厨艺精湛。唯一的不足,就是由于长期担任领导职务,使得玛莎的性格古板、严肃认真。一天,玛莎的妹妹不幸车祸身亡了,留下了年幼的女儿莲娜。莲娜因为痛失母亲,患上了厌食症。无论玛莎煮出怎么美味的食物,都无法激起莲娜的食欲。这时,新来的厨师马里奥(塞尔吉奥•卡斯特里托 Sergio Castellitto 饰)的出现彻底打破了餐厅一贯宁静的气氛,玛莎认为他是老板请来替代她的位置的,于是处处与马里奥作对。然而,马里奥却处处帮助玛莎,帮助玛莎治疗莲娜内心的创伤,甚至当莲娜被她的生父接往意大利后,义无反顾地陪玛莎飞往了意大利。于是玛莎决定用她的双手去经营这一份美味关系。
张美娜
发表于9分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb