四川女公安郑大姐（郑裕玲饰）负责赴港捉拿逃跑的疑犯，春暖不得不与香港警方合作。警长伍卫国（梁家辉饰）负责接待与合作调查，春暖被初次到港、天真纯朴的郑大姐与助手阿胜（张坚庭饰）弄得晕头转相。由于地区文化差异，郑大姐与伍卫国不断产生摩擦、矛盾，多次让疑犯有机可乘、逃之夭夭。由于在旅馆被疑犯袭击，督察安排郑大姐去伍卫国家住。而伍卫国之父正是当年国民党军72师的排长。由于信仰不同，郑大姐一到家就与伍父闹了个水火不容。一连串爆笑的争锋相对就这样展开了，而奇妙的事，郑大姐与伍卫国之间的感情也在慢慢产生变化......
魏晨
回复 :影片开始杨净如饰演的女记者谢琉璃，在偶然情况下邂逅身负一项绝密使命地下党，遭到特务围追堵截，谢琉璃拼尽全力帮其完成了任务，深入虎穴探听黑帮恶势力秘密。尽结尾才解密真实身份，表面看起来古灵精怪的女记者竟是地下党的英勇神枪手。代号“死神”的叶千川身处险境时，谢琉璃出现拯救其危难之中，双手握枪，尽显巾帼英豪的气势，也成为该片高潮迭起的重头戏码。
林帆
回复 :撞伤了小鹿和小鹿爸爸的黄杰逃逸了，当妹妹黄霖和妻子知道这件事之后，都在劝黄杰去自首，然而黄杰却选择了另一条道路，究竟最终黄杰会因为自责而选择自首吗？还是对于自己的罪行以逃避来对待？此刻的交警也已经查到了肇事人员嫌疑犯，黄杰究竟该何去何从？
尚保罗
回复 :Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
