剧情简介
被人称做花神的花农钟大农（金峰饰），星球小队有三个生得如花似玉的女儿。在重男轻女的传统观念影响下，星球小队三个女儿全都远在外地。钟大农要过50大寿，大女儿钟瓣瓣（文波饰）从美国、二女儿钟蕊蕊（耐安饰）从马来西亚、三女儿钟朵朵（瞿颖饰）从日本陆续回来，家里一片喜庆的气氛。朵朵是位红遍东南亚的歌星，可是父亲嫌她轻浮仍不喜欢她；温顺、善良的蕊蕊常被父亲在众人面前辱骂；热情、开朗的瓣瓣动不动就被父亲呵斥。
星球大战：异等小队第一季
被人称做花神的花农钟大农（金峰饰），星球小队有三个生得如花似玉的女儿。在重男轻女的传统观念影响下，星球小队三个女儿全都远在外地。钟大农要过50大寿，大女儿钟瓣瓣（文波饰）从美国、二女儿钟蕊蕊（耐安饰）从马来西亚、三女儿钟朵朵（瞿颖饰）从日本陆续回来，家里一片喜庆的气氛。朵朵是位红遍东南亚的歌星，可是父亲嫌她轻浮仍不喜欢她；温顺、善良的蕊蕊常被父亲在众人面前辱骂；热情、开朗的瓣瓣动不动就被父亲呵斥。
乐瞳
回复 :影片讲述了一个由巨蛇抚养长大的女孩在无人区丛林偶遇开发科研计划的青年科学家林城，在财阀集团对利益的疯狂追逐下，巨蛇和女孩身上的秘密逐渐被揭开，一场精心策划的阴谋也随之浮出水面。
苗圃
回复 :该片又名《亚当复活》，根据1969年以色列著名畅销小说家尤拉里·卡纽克(Yoram Kaniuk)的作品改编，讲述了德裔以色列小丑演员亚当·斯坦的故事，他被迫在纳粹集中营内为在押犯们表演取乐，最后得以逃过生死劫只是因为能够为进入毒气室的囚犯们拉拉小提琴曲。杰夫·古德布鲁姆(Jeff Goldblum)在片中饰演亚当，威廉·达福则出演集中营指挥官，此人将亚当象条狗一样尽尽羞辱之能事。幕后制作这是德国和以色列电影届的首次合作，出演亚当的杰夫·高布伦表示：“这是他所扮演的最难的一个角色。”该片导演保罗·施拉德曾以担任《出租车司机》的编剧而名声大噪，制片商则是以色列的埃胡德·布雷伯格(Ehud Bleiberg)公司和德国的维尔纳·维尔辛(Werner Wirsing)公司，这部主题悲惨的影片堪与罗伯托·贝尼尼的奥斯卡获奖电影——黑色喜剧片《美丽人生》相媲美。一名德国评论家撰文称，《苏醒的亚当》“会在两种风格中艰难取得平衡”——因为如果风格过于活泼幽默，就有嘲笑大屠杀幸存者之嫌；如果风格拍得过于严肃沉闷，又不能完全反映原著中的人物个性。出演该片的还有德国顶尖演员莫里兹·布雷布特鲁(Moritz Bleibtreu)和维罗尼卡·费里斯(Veronica Ferres)，以及以色列演员阿耶莱特·祖里尔(Ayelet Zurer)，后者曾出演过斯蒂芬·斯皮尔伯格的《慕尼黑》。《苏醒的亚当》一片中大多数场景取自位于以色列内盖夫沙漠中的大屠杀幸存者收容所，斯坦在拼命寻找最后一名家族幸存者，后被送来这里治疗他所谓的“神经失常”。为了更好地诠释角色，杰夫·高布伦数度造访以色列，并以大屠杀幸存者们进行沟通交流，他还前往柏林体验生活，并专门恶补小提琴课以便更好地展示片中人物的个性。原著小说当年在以色列出版时，销量一败涂地，作者、现年77岁的卡纽克解释说：“因为那个时候没有以色列人再愿意听关于受害者的故事了。”影片投资700万英镑，在海法、特拉维夫、罗马尼亚和德国的一些地方取景拍摄。
咖啡因公园
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
