李殊
发表于9分钟前
回复
: 香港闹市的街开著一家不大不小的烧腊店,店里老板罗宝成(黄光亮饰)为一个中年男子,身材高大,那天的生意是较好的,但是他却感到担心,因为他的妻子锺惠娟(叶晨饰)已失踪多天。这时,一名员工给成一封信,正是失踪多天的锺惠娟。在信里娟跟成说自己没事,不用找她。成觉得有点怪,于是去了警署报警,成向负责本案的警司李sir(林嘉华饰)说信里的不是娟的笔迹,而且署名也是错的,很明显信里的人是伪装的,但是警察却不想为一个失踪多天的人费力气,但这一切已经被身边的李sir看在眼里。此时,要说回罗宝成和锺惠娟的事,原来成瞒着妻子和失婚妇人钱玉荷(符钰晶饰)同居,娟得知后马上去了找荷起冲突,在争执中把娟勒死,荷为了不被发现自己杀了人居然把娟的尸体焚烧…
阿郎
发表于9分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb