黄伟文
发表于4分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb
韩京日
发表于8分钟前
回复
:故事发生在千年之前的越前国,紫氏部(吉永小百合 饰)嫁给比自己大很多的丈夫,生下女儿贤子。丈夫婚后不久就去世,紫氏一直过着孀居的生活并开始创作小说《源氏物语》。不久,藤原道长唤她来京都担任女儿彰子的老师,希望把彰子调教成皇后最合适的人选。紫氏入宫,一边继续创作《源氏物语》,一边给彰子讲其中的故事……这是关于光源氏一生的爱情故事。源氏(天海佑希 饰)俊美无比,从小失去母亲。他岁与左大臣的女儿葵上成婚,但并不爱她。源氏从小对父亲的宠妃藤壶心生爱慕,并发生了乱伦关系。藤壶怀孕生子,使两人都充满负罪感。源氏意外发现一个叫紫上(常盘贵子 饰)的女孩,长得很像藤壶。便把她养在家里,并娶为正式。源氏又相继与明石姬、栊月夜、六条等十数位贵族女性发生了暧昧关系。贵族的糜烂生活,人世的宿命,女人的悲剧,一并听紫氏娓娓道来。