剧情简介
本片是一部围绕智利裔墨西哥籍魔幻现实主义大师亚历桑德罗·佐杜洛夫斯基的传记片。主要讲述其在早年的创作之路。在片中，亚历桑德罗还与很多国内年轻有才但还未成名的年轻人见面交谈。
双子
本片是一部围绕智利裔墨西哥籍魔幻现实主义大师亚历桑德罗·佐杜洛夫斯基的传记片。主要讲述其在早年的创作之路。在片中，亚历桑德罗还与很多国内年轻有才但还未成名的年轻人见面交谈。
朴相民
回复 :民国十九年，盐城。从海外学成归国的英俊青年潘子浩开了一家\"福安\"心理诊所。正当事业风生水起时，他的患者和助手却接连被害，自己也遭遇袭击险些丧命。\r负责案件侦破的是女探长苏玲和警察钱涛。潘子浩和钱涛是老同学，而他看苏玲也似曾相识。潘子皓利用自己的专业知识，分析出了凶手的心理特征和体貌特征，并分析凶手一定认为自己知道什么秘密，所以准备杀他灭口，而且这个秘密一定就在诊所。\r重重危险之下，事情似乎更加扑朔迷离……
周传雄
回复 :一个曾参加越战的美国大兵来到德国充当雇佣杀手。其实他本来就是德国人，回德国就是回家。在慕尼黑的黑道上，有着形形色色的怪人，如客厅里摆放巨大游戏机的母亲，命数已到的中年男妓，贩卖毒品和色情刊物的女子，等等。
大桥卓弥
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
