19世纪的纽约，久日精品上流阶层的人士有着一套自己的判断标准和生活规则，久日精品要求体面、得体。年轻律师纽伦（Daniel Day-Lewis 饰）也不例外，他将与门当户对的千金小姐梅（Winona Ryder 饰）订婚。然而在订婚前夕，他与梅的表姐、刚刚离婚自欧洲回到纽约的艾伦（米歇 尔·菲佛 Michelle Pfeiffer 饰）重逢，二人 一见如故，情愫顿生。然而艾伦的大胆行为和追求自我的作风是不被那个上流社会所接纳和允许的，在大家的眼中她是一个讨人厌的怪物。纽伦却意识到这种性格的可贵，并且被这种性格所折服，如果不能和所爱的人在一起，如果一生不是为自己而是为礼数为体面而活，人生将是多么的空虚和苍白。纽伦想和艾伦私奔，然而梅却怀孕了。虽然想追求属于自己的幸福，但是却同样不想伤害他人的这对爱人，最终选择了放手。纽伦和梅结婚了，脾气和顺的梅一直处于无辜的中心。然而直到梅的死去，他们才看见了事物的另一面……
老狼
回复 :一个夏季的雨天，女生金太嬉（李银珠饰）走进男生徐仁友（李秉宪饰）的伞下避雨，男生对她一见钟情。大学里二人的感情逐步升温，雨夜，二人吵架又和好，感情浓得化不开。任友服兵役前一晚，没有等到答应前来送行的太嬉，就此缘悭一面。17年后，徐仁友已经有一个幸福的家庭，太太和小女儿让他的生活从容平静。在男校执教的他，发现班上一个17岁的男孩子的动作举止与当年的太嬉惊人相似，勾起了他埋藏多年的回忆，才发觉原来自己一直不能忘怀。而男学生面对仁友的感情，内心也起了波澜。甚至与小女朋友分手。太嬉，到底在哪里？17年前的谜团解开后，是一段极致的生死之恋。
麦可史密斯
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
音乐铁人
回复 :John Forbes is a family man who's tired of the 9 to 5 humdrum of his job an insurance company executive. Life gets a little more exciting for him when he calls upon femme fatale Mona Stevens. Her boyfriend has embezzled from a store insured by Forbes' company and has showered her with gifts using the loot. Forbes comes to collect the ill-gotten gifts, but the boyfriend is in jail, and Forbes falls hard for Mona and begins an affair. The only problem is that MacDonald, a private dick who freelances for the insurance company, has had his eyes on Mona first. The obsessed MacDonald turns the soon-to-be-released boyfriend against Forbes.
